Texas State Level Independent Prosecutor Needed

The Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) in State v Stephenson last year said that the legislature cannot delegate independent prosecutorial authority to the Attorney General (AG).

That is terrible news on several fronts. First, we are not very likely to get any substantive election fraud prosecutions out of the very places we need it, the big counties that are controlled by Soros-funded District Attorneys hostile to election integrity.

Second, the Texas Sovereignty Act as written calls for the delegation of independent prosecution of the Official Oppression Act by the AG, and that provision of the bill as written is now Dead On Arrival.

Finally, the Soros-funded DAs in big counties are not just refusing to prosecute election integrity.  They are not prosecuting a host of other laws, as well.  They let the 2020 rioters go. Some are saying they will not prosecute Texas abortion law.  We need independent prosecutorial authority delegated to some statewide figure, and the CCA says we can't use the AG for that position.

I have been talking to a number of folks about how not only will to solve the election integrity problem, but how we can expand the subject matter jurisdiction beyond election code to Official Oppression, abortion, public integrity, riot, sedition, and border-security-related crimes.

So how do we solve the problem?  A Constitutional amendment could do the trick, but that takes time we don’t have, and more importantly it requires Texas Democrat approval, something which is VERY unlikely to happen.

I want one of the following solutions:

  • State District Attorney (elected) with the limited subject matter jurisdiction discussed above and statewide independent prosecutorial power. Would want the enabling legislation to call for a special election in November, 2023 to fill the position.
  • A prosecutorial bureau – call it the State Prosecutor’s Office - under the judiciary with the limited subject matter jurisdiction discussed above that can be appointed or elected.
  • I have heard one person opine that the CCA might not accept a State District Attorney because the language of the judicial section of the Texas Constitution (Art. 5) implies without explicitly stating it, that only smaller districts for prosecutors were contemplated. That commentator said he thinks that four or five districts would pass CCA review whereas a statewide district might not.  I would be OK with that IF the districts were arranged in such a way that the large counties did not swamp the votes of the surrounding counties.  The whole reason for this exercise is to ensure that the big counties don’t stop prosecuting laws important to the security to all Texans.


Two other approaches to solve the problem have already have filed bills.  State Representative Keith Bell has introduced a bill to allow adjacent county DAs to prosecute election crimes if asked to do so by the AG. (HB 678).  And State Rep Bryan Slaton has introduced HB 125 to allow the AG to file suit against DAs who have a pattern and practice of not enforcing election crimes, allowing civil penalties. (I have been told that there is at least one Senator working on the same approach as HB 125.)

While I appreciate those attempts, I am not too excited about either approach. I favor the adjacent county approach over the lawsuits by the AG against DAs. Even if the AG prevails in court against a big county DA, forcing the DA to act, that forced, hostile DA is unlikely to do a good job, and we STILL will not produce much.

And while the adjacent county route is better than nothing, it puts too much of a burden on already stretched thin DAs in usually rapidly growing jurisdictions that have more than enough workload.  It is likely to be viewed for it is – one more unfunded mandate by the Texas Legislature on the counties.

I am shopping the three solutions above in both the Senate and the House.  I think there is broad agreement that the problem created by the CCA needs to be fixed.  I hope we can fix it AND do more to ensure that laws needed for ordered rule of law are enforced in Texas.

I welcome feedback on how we solve this problem that is vital to the security and liberty of Texans.  And I welcome any information about what legislators have what plan to solve this problem.

Tom Glass leads Texas Constitutional Enforcement (txce.org and Texas Constitutional Enforcement groups on Facebook, MeWe, and Gab).  You can follow him on Twitter (@tomgglass) and reach him via email at info at tomglass.org.

Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Ed Sunderland
    commented 2023-01-18 11:02:42 -0600
    Hi Tom, interesting topic. Two Texas Voters have been front and center with this for years. Texas Election Code 273.001 is written as such; (a) If two or more registered voters of the territory covered by an election present affidavits alleging criminal conduct in connection with the election to the county or district attorney having jurisdiction in that territory, the county or district attorney shall investigate the allegations. If the election covers territory in more than one county, the voters may present the affidavits to the attorney general, and the attorney general shall investigate the allegations.

    The word “shall” is written twice. Once for the Local District Attorney and following the law and advice of Texas AG Ken Paxton, I submitted an Election Fraud complaint to the Local Denton County DA. I was quickly escorted out of his office by Mr. Brian Wolf. When I asked Mr. Wolf on the way out if he would state his reason for denying service on my citizen’s election fraud complaint he said “NO”. We then attempted to have Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton address our election fraud complaint since the Local District Attorney’s in Denton and Travis County declined service. With similar results, common citizens and registered Texas voters were defeated again by Texas Law Enforcement. The only route left in this state was the Texas Supreme Court where we submitted a writ of mandamus which was concluded with a denial of a hearing without comment. Again, common citizen Texas voters following the laws of the Texas Election Code defeated by the Texas Election Code?

    *What one sees as a constitutional issue, we see as complete corruption of Texas Law Enforcement designed and forged to deny the common Texas Voter clean and fair elections with no voice or action to stop election fraud on both sides of the political aisle. The Democrat Party was as usual non-responsive to our complaint and the RNC’s Legal response left no mistake that they aren’t serious about election integrity with regard to candidate qualifications. What are Texas citizens and voters to do when we have clear law enforcement evidence of fraud, and taxpayer-funded Law enforcement that isn’t law enforcement?

    As one can imagine this is unacceptable and isn’t over.

    Ed Sunderland
    Flower Mound, TX
  • Tom Glass
    published this page in Blog 2023-01-18 08:26:21 -0600